提交 f9e9dcb3 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds

x86[-64]:Remove 'volatile' from atomic_t

Any code that relies on the volatile would be a bug waiting to happen
anyway.

Don't encourage people to think that putting 'volatile' on data
structures somehow fixes problems.  We should always use proper locking
(and other serialization) techniques.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 16afea02
...@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ...@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
* on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address the user gave us, * on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address the user gave us,
* not some alias that contains the same information. * not some alias that contains the same information.
*/ */
typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t; typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } #define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
......
...@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ ...@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
* on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address the user gave us, * on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address the user gave us,
* not some alias that contains the same information. * not some alias that contains the same information.
*/ */
typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t; typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } #define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册