未验证 提交 7de5dcbf 编写于 作者: O Oleg Nenashev 提交者: GitHub

Fix rendering of links in the Maintainer guide

上级 86c99b80
......@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Code reviews do NOT pursue the following goals:
* Make contributors to have atomic commit history or to squash their pull request
** Not every contributor is a Git expert, do not request changes in the commit history unless it is necessary
** Core maintainers can squash PRs during the merge.
If you feel this is important, add the [squash-merge-me](https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Asquash-merge-me) label
If you feel this is important, add the link:https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Asquash-merge-me[squash-merge-me] label
** We want to keep pull requests focused when possible (one feature / fix per pull request),
but we can live without it if there is no need to backport changes to the stable baseline.
......@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ Merge process can be initiated once a pull request matches the requirements:
(link:https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4387[example]).
This is usually the case when a data migration occurs, a feature has been removed, a significant behavior change is introduced (including when there is a way to opt out),
or in general when we expect at least a large minority of admins to benefit from knowing about the change, e.g. to apply a new option.
* If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a _Bug_ or _Improvement_, and be labeled as `lts-candidate` to be considered (see [query](https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?filter=12146)).
* If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a _Bug_ or _Improvement_, and be labeled as `lts-candidate` to be considered (see link:https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?filter=12146[this Jira query]).
==== Step 2: Is it a good time to merge?
......@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ LTS backporting, if needed, will be handled separately by the release team.
Sometimes we have pull requests which include dozens of commits including many non-substantial changes (merge commits, addressing review comments, etc.).
We do not require contributors to spend time on cleaning it up, because core maintainers can squash PRs during the merge.
Reviewers can add a [squash-merge-me](https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Asquash-merge-me) label during reviews to highlight that it is needed.
Reviewers can add a link:https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Asquash-merge-me[squash-merge-me] label during reviews to highlight that it is needed.
At the same time, we do not require any pull request to be merged as a single commit.
Multiple commits are useful in many cases.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册