提交 b411f946 编写于 作者: H Hans de Goede 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rtc: cmos: Do not export alarm rtc_ops when we do not support alarms

[ Upstream commit fbb974ba693bbfb4e24a62181ef16d4e45febc37 ]

When there is no IRQ configured for the RTC, the rtc-cmos code does not
support alarms, all alarm rtc_ops fail with -EIO / -EINVAL.

The rtc-core expects a rtc driver which does not support rtc alarms to
not have alarm ops at all. Otherwise the wakealarm sysfs attr will read
as empty rather then returning an error, making it impossible for
userspace to find out beforehand if alarms are supported.

A system without an IRQ for the RTC before this patch:
[root@localhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
[root@localhost ~]#

After this patch:
[root@localhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
cat: /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]#

This fixes gnome-session + systemd trying to use suspend-then-hibernate,
which causes systemd to abort the suspend when writing the RTC alarm fails.

BugLink: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9988Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
上级 121f89dd
......@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int cmos_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned char rtc_control;
/* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */
if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
return -EIO;
......@@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static int cmos_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
unsigned char mon, mday, hrs, min, sec, rtc_control;
int ret;
/* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */
if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
return -EIO;
......@@ -516,9 +518,6 @@ static int cmos_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long flags;
if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
if (enabled)
......@@ -579,6 +578,12 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops = {
.alarm_irq_enable = cmos_alarm_irq_enable,
};
static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm = {
.read_time = cmos_read_time,
.set_time = cmos_set_time,
.proc = cmos_procfs,
};
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
......@@ -855,9 +860,12 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *ports, int rtc_irq)
dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ %d is already in use\n", rtc_irq);
goto cleanup1;
}
cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops;
} else {
cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm;
}
cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops;
cmos_rtc.rtc->nvram_old_abi = true;
retval = rtc_register_device(cmos_rtc.rtc);
if (retval)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册