Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
9 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

前往新版Gitcode，体验更适合开发者的 AI 搜索 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 22 8月, 2023 4 次提交
  3. 16 9月, 2022 3 次提交
  5. 06 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 08 2月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 12 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 08 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 06 8月, 2020 1 次提交
    • P
      locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster · 0cd39f46
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      By using lockdep_assert_*() from seqlock.h, the spaghetti monster
attacked.

Attack back by reducing seqlock.h dependencies from two key high level headers:

 - <linux/seqlock.h>:               -Remove <linux/ww_mutex.h>
 - <linux/time.h>:                  -Remove <linux/seqlock.h>
 - <linux/sched.h>:                 +Add    <linux/seqlock.h>

The price was to add it to sched.h ...

Core header fallout, we add direct header dependencies instead of gaining them
parasitically from higher level headers:

 - <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h>:  +Add <asm/bug.h>
 - <linux/hrtimer.h>:               +Add <linux/seqlock.h>
 - <linux/ktime.h>:                 +Add <asm/bug.h>
 - <linux/lockdep.h>:               +Add <linux/smp.h>
 - <linux/sched.h>:                 +Add <linux/seqlock.h>
 - <linux/videodev2.h>:             +Add <linux/kernel.h>

Arch headers fallout:

 - PARISC: <asm/timex.h>:           +Add <asm/special_insns.h>
 - SH:     <asm/io.h>:              +Add <asm/page.h>
 - SPARC:  <asm/timer_64.h>:        +Add <uapi/asm/asi.h>
 - SPARC:  <asm/vvar.h>:            +Add <asm/processor.h>, <asm/barrier.h>
                                    -Remove <linux/seqlock.h>
 - X86:    <asm/fixmap.h>:          +Add <asm/pgtable_types.h>
                                    -Remove <asm/acpi.h>

There's also a bunch of parasitic header dependency fallout in .c files, not listed
separately.

[ mingo: Extended the changelog, split up & fixed the original patch. ]
Co-developed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200804133438.GK2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
      0cd39f46
  15. 07 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 06 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 22 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 12 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 20 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • K
      x86/cpu/amd: Enable the fixed Instructions Retired counter IRPERF · 21b5ee59
      由 Kim Phillips 提交于 
      Commit

  aaf24884 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired)
		  performance counter")

added support for access to the free-running counter via 'perf -e
msr/irperf/', but when exercised, it always returns a 0 count:

BEFORE:

  $ perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true

   Performance counter stats for 'true':

             624,833      instructions
                   0      msr/irperf/

Simply set its enable bit - HWCR bit 30 - to make it start counting.

Enablement is restricted to all machines advertising IRPERF capability,
except those susceptible to an erratum that makes the IRPERF return
bad values.

That erratum occurs in Family 17h models 00-1fh [1], but not in F17h
models 20h and above [2].

AFTER (on a family 17h model 31h machine):

  $ perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true

   Performance counter stats for 'true':

             621,690      instructions
             622,490      msr/irperf/

[1] Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 00h-0Fh Processors
[2] Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 30h-3Fh Processors

The revision guides are available from the bugzilla Link below.

 [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Fixes: aaf24884 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired) performance counter")
Signed-off-by: NKim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200214201805.13830-1-kim.phillips@amd.com
      21b5ee59
  25. 25 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 17 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 03 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • M
      sched/topology: Improve load balancing on AMD EPYC systems · a55c7454
      由 Matt Fleming 提交于 
      SD_BALANCE_{FORK,EXEC} and SD_WAKE_AFFINE are stripped in sd_init()
for any sched domains with a NUMA distance greater than 2 hops
(RECLAIM_DISTANCE). The idea being that it's expensive to balance
across domains that far apart.

However, as is rather unfortunately explained in:

  commit 32e45ff4 ("mm: increase RECLAIM_DISTANCE to 30")

the value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE is based on node distance tables from
2011-era hardware.

Current AMD EPYC machines have the following NUMA node distances:

 node distances:
 node   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
   0:  10  16  16  16  32  32  32  32
   1:  16  10  16  16  32  32  32  32
   2:  16  16  10  16  32  32  32  32
   3:  16  16  16  10  32  32  32  32
   4:  32  32  32  32  10  16  16  16
   5:  32  32  32  32  16  10  16  16
   6:  32  32  32  32  16  16  10  16
   7:  32  32  32  32  16  16  16  10

where 2 hops is 32.

The result is that the scheduler fails to load balance properly across
NUMA nodes on different sockets -- 2 hops apart.

For example, pinning 16 busy threads to NUMA nodes 0 (CPUs 0-7) and 4
(CPUs 32-39) like so,

  $ numactl -C 0-7,32-39 ./spinner 16

causes all threads to fork and remain on node 0 until the active
balancer kicks in after a few seconds and forcibly moves some threads
to node 4.

Override node_reclaim_distance for AMD Zen.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190808195301.13222-3-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      a55c7454
  31. 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/CPU/AMD: Clear RDRAND CPUID bit on AMD family 15h/16h · c49a0a80
      由 Tom Lendacky 提交于 
      There have been reports of RDRAND issues after resuming from suspend on
some AMD family 15h and family 16h systems. This issue stems from a BIOS
not performing the proper steps during resume to ensure RDRAND continues
to function properly.

RDRAND support is indicated by CPUID Fn00000001_ECX[30]. This bit can be
reset by clearing MSR C001_1004[62]. Any software that checks for RDRAND
support using CPUID, including the kernel, will believe that RDRAND is
not supported.

Update the CPU initialization to clear the RDRAND CPUID bit for any family
15h and 16h processor that supports RDRAND. If it is known that the family
15h or family 16h system does not have an RDRAND resume issue or that the
system will not be placed in suspend, the "rdrand=force" kernel parameter
can be used to stop the clearing of the RDRAND CPUID bit.

Additionally, update the suspend and resume path to save and restore the
MSR C001_1004 value to ensure that the RDRAND CPUID setting remains in
place after resuming from suspend.

Note, that clearing the RDRAND CPUID bit does not prevent a processor
that normally supports the RDRAND instruction from executing it. So any
code that determined the support based on family and model won't #UD.
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7543af91666f491547bd86cebb1e17c66824ab9f.1566229943.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
      c49a0a80
  33. 22 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      x86: Remove X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC · be261ffc
      由 Josh Poimboeuf 提交于 
      AMD and Intel both have serializing lfence (X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC).
They've both had it for a long time, and AMD has had it enabled in Linux
since Spectre v1 was announced.

Back then, there was a proposal to remove the serializing mfence feature
bit (X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC), since both AMD and Intel have
serializing lfence.  At the time, it was (ahem) speculated that some
hypervisors might not yet support its removal, so it remained for the
time being.

Now a year-and-a-half later, it should be safe to remove.

I asked Andrew Cooper about whether it's still needed:

  So if you're virtualised, you've got no choice in the matter.  lfence
  is either dispatch-serialising or not on AMD, and you won't be able to
  change it.

  Furthermore, you can't accurately tell what state the bit is in, because
  the MSR might not be virtualised at all, or may not reflect the true
  state in hardware.  Worse still, attempting to set the bit may not be
  successful even if there isn't a fault for doing so.

  Xen sets the DE_CFG bit unconditionally, as does Linux by the looks of
  things (see MSR_F10H_DECFG_LFENCE_SERIALIZE_BIT).  ISTR other hypervisor
  vendors saying the same, but I don't have any information to hand.

  If you are running under a hypervisor which has been updated, then
  lfence will almost certainly be dispatch-serialising in practice, and
  you'll almost certainly see the bit already set in DE_CFG.  If you're
  running under a hypervisor which hasn't been patched since Spectre,
  you've already lost in many more ways.

  I'd argue that X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC is not worth keeping.

So remove it.  This will reduce some code rot, and also make it easier
to hook barrier_nospec() up to a cmdline disable for performance
raisins, without having to need an alternative_3() macro.
Signed-off-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d990aa51e40063acb9888e8c1b688e41355a9588.1562255067.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
      be261ffc
  35. 24 5月, 2019 1 次提交
    • F
      x86/CPU/AMD: Don't force the CPB cap when running under a hypervisor · 2ac44ab6
      由 Frank van der Linden 提交于 
      For F17h AMD CPUs, the CPB capability ('Core Performance Boost') is forcibly set,
because some versions of that chip incorrectly report that they do not have it.

However, a hypervisor may filter out the CPB capability, for good
reasons. For example, KVM currently does not emulate setting the CPB
bit in MSR_K7_HWCR, and unchecked MSR access errors will be thrown
when trying to set it as a guest:

	unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010015 (tried to write 0x0000000001000011) at rIP: 0xffffffff890638f4 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)

	Call Trace:
	boost_set_msr+0x50/0x80 [acpi_cpufreq]
	cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x86/0x560
	sort_range+0x20/0x20
	cpuhp_thread_fun+0xb0/0x110
	smpboot_thread_fn+0xef/0x160
	kthread+0x113/0x130
	kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
	ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

To avoid this issue, don't forcibly set the CPB capability for a CPU
when running under a hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: NFrank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com
Fixes: 02371991 ("x86/CPU/AMD: Set the CPB bit unconditionally on F17h")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522221745.GA15789@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com
[ Minor edits to the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2ac44ab6
  37. 21 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  39. 19 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  41. 18 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  43. 08 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • B
      x86/kernel: Fix more -Wmissing-prototypes warnings · ad3bc25a
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      ... with the goal of eventually enabling -Wmissing-prototypes by
default. At least on x86.

Make functions static where possible, otherwise add prototypes or make
them visible through includes.

asm/trace/ changes courtesy of Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> # ACPI + cpufreq bits
Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
      ad3bc25a
  45. 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  47. 20 7月, 2018 1 次提交
    • P
      x86/jump_label: Initialize static branching early · 8990cac6
      由 Pavel Tatashin 提交于 
      Static branching is useful to runtime patch branches that are used in hot
path, but are infrequently changed.

The x86 clock framework is one example that uses static branches to setup
the best clock during boot and never changes it again.

It is desired to enable the TSC based sched clock early to allow fine
grained boot time analysis early on. That requires the static branching
functionality to be functional early as well.

Static branching requires patching nop instructions, thus,
arch_init_ideal_nops() must be called prior to jump_label_init().

Do all the necessary steps to call arch_init_ideal_nops() right after
early_cpu_init(), which also allows to insert a call to jump_label_init()
right after that. jump_label_init() will be called again from the generic
init code, but the code is protected against reinitialization already.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com
Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: feng.tang@intel.com
Cc: pmladek@suse.com
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180719205545.16512-10-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
      8990cac6
  49. 03 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  51. 22 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  53. 21 6月, 2018 3 次提交
  55. 17 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  57. 10 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • K
      x86/bugs: Rename _RDS to _SSBD · 9f65fb29
      由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于 
      Intel collateral will reference the SSB mitigation bit in IA32_SPEC_CTL[2]
as SSBD (Speculative Store Bypass Disable).

Hence changing it.

It is unclear yet what the MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (0x10a) Bit(4) name
is going to be. Following the rename it would be SSBD_NO but that rolls out
to Speculative Store Bypass Disable No.

Also fixed the missing space in X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD.

[ tglx: Fixup x86_amd_rds_enable() and rds_tif_to_amd_ls_cfg() as well ]
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      9f65fb29
  59. 06 5月, 2018 2 次提交