提交 9b332820 编写于 作者: M Michal Privoznik

lib: Format PCI address differently

Currently, the way we format PCI address is using printf-s
precision, e.g. "%.4x". This works if we don't want to print any
value outside of bounds (which is usually the case). However,
turns out, PCI domain can be 0x10000 which doesn't work well with
our format strings. However, if we change the format string to
"%04x" then we still pad small values with zeroes but also we are
able to print values that are larger than four digits. In fact,
this format string used by kernel to print a PCI address:

  "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d"

The other three format strings (for bus, device and function) are
changed too, so that we use the same format string as kernel.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
上级 f0c50bc1
......@@ -293,8 +293,8 @@ virPCIDeviceAddressFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
virPCIDeviceAddress addr,
bool includeTypeInAddr)
{
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<address %sdomain='0x%.4x' bus='0x%.2x' "
"slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'/>\n",
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<address %sdomain='0x%04x' bus='0x%02x' "
"slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'/>\n",
includeTypeInAddr ? "type='pci' " : "",
addr.domain,
addr.bus,
......
......@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ virDomainPCIAddressReserveAddrInternal(virDomainPCIAddressSetPtr addrs,
/* The first device decides the isolation group for the
* entire bus */
bus->isolationGroup = isolationGroup;
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %.4x:%.2x assigned isolation group %u because of "
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %04x:%02x assigned isolation group %u because of "
"first device %s",
addr->domain, addr->bus, isolationGroup, addrStr);
} else if (bus->isolationGroup != isolationGroup && fromConfig) {
......@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ virDomainPCIAddressReserveAddrInternal(virDomainPCIAddressSetPtr addrs,
* back to the default (because at that point isolation can't
* be guaranteed anymore) */
bus->isolationGroup = 0;
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %.4x:%.2x assigned isolation group %u because of "
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %04x:%02x assigned isolation group %u because of "
"user assigned address %s",
addr->domain, addr->bus, isolationGroup, addrStr);
}
......@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ virDomainPCIAddressFindUnusedFunctionOnBus(virDomainPCIAddressBusPtr bus,
if (!virDomainPCIAddressFlagsCompatible(searchAddr, addrStr, bus->flags,
flags, false, false)) {
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %.4x:%.2x is not compatible with the device",
VIR_DEBUG("PCI bus %04x:%02x is not compatible with the device",
searchAddr->domain, searchAddr->bus);
} else {
while (searchAddr->slot <= bus->maxSlot) {
......@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ virDomainPCIAddressFindUnusedFunctionOnBus(virDomainPCIAddressBusPtr bus,
}
}
VIR_DEBUG("PCI slot %.4x:%.2x:%.2x already in use",
VIR_DEBUG("PCI slot %04x:%02x:%02x already in use",
searchAddr->domain, searchAddr->bus, searchAddr->slot);
searchAddr->slot++;
}
......@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ virDomainPCIAddressGetNextAddr(virDomainPCIAddressSetPtr addrs,
return -1;
success:
VIR_DEBUG("Found free PCI slot %.4x:%.2x:%.2x",
VIR_DEBUG("Found free PCI slot %04x:%02x:%02x",
a.domain, a.bus, a.slot);
*next_addr = a;
return 0;
......
......@@ -7091,8 +7091,8 @@ virDomainDeviceInfoFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
switch ((virDomainDeviceAddressType) info->type) {
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI:
if (!virPCIDeviceAddressIsEmpty(&info->addr.pci)) {
virBufferAsprintf(&attrBuf, " domain='0x%.4x' bus='0x%.2x' "
"slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'",
virBufferAsprintf(&attrBuf, " domain='0x%04x' bus='0x%02x' "
"slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'",
info->addr.pci.domain,
info->addr.pci.bus,
info->addr.pci.slot,
......
......@@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ virNodeDeviceCapPCIDefFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
virBufferAddLit(buf, "<capability type='phys_function'>\n");
virBufferAdjustIndent(buf, 2);
virBufferAsprintf(buf,
"<address domain='0x%.4x' bus='0x%.2x' "
"slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'/>\n",
"<address domain='0x%04x' bus='0x%02x' "
"slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'/>\n",
data->pci_dev.physical_function->domain,
data->pci_dev.physical_function->bus,
data->pci_dev.physical_function->slot,
......@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ virNodeDeviceCapPCIDefFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
virBufferAdjustIndent(buf, 2);
for (i = 0; i < data->pci_dev.num_virtual_functions; i++) {
virBufferAsprintf(buf,
"<address domain='0x%.4x' bus='0x%.2x' "
"slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'/>\n",
"<address domain='0x%04x' bus='0x%02x' "
"slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'/>\n",
data->pci_dev.virtual_functions[i]->domain,
data->pci_dev.virtual_functions[i]->bus,
data->pci_dev.virtual_functions[i]->slot,
......@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ virNodeDeviceCapPCIDefFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
virBufferAdjustIndent(buf, 2);
for (i = 0; i < data->pci_dev.nIommuGroupDevices; i++) {
virBufferAsprintf(buf,
"<address domain='0x%.4x' bus='0x%.2x' "
"slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'/>\n",
"<address domain='0x%04x' bus='0x%02x' "
"slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'/>\n",
data->pci_dev.iommuGroupDevices[i]->domain,
data->pci_dev.iommuGroupDevices[i]->bus,
data->pci_dev.iommuGroupDevices[i]->slot,
......
......@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct _virZPCIDeviceAddress {
unsigned int fid;
};
#define VIR_PCI_DEVICE_ADDRESS_FMT "%.4x:%.2x:%.2x.%.1x"
#define VIR_PCI_DEVICE_ADDRESS_FMT "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d"
struct _virPCIDeviceAddress {
unsigned int domain;
......
......@@ -1006,8 +1006,8 @@ cmdAttachInterface(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
virBufferAddLit(&buf, "<source>\n");
virBufferAdjustIndent(&buf, 2);
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "<address type='pci' domain='0x%.4x'"
" bus='0x%.2x' slot='0x%.2x' function='0x%.1x'/>\n",
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "<address type='pci' domain='0x%04x'"
" bus='0x%02x' slot='0x%02x' function='0x%d'/>\n",
pciAddr.domain, pciAddr.bus,
pciAddr.slot, pciAddr.function);
virBufferAdjustIndent(&buf, -2);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册