提交 812b1537 编写于 作者: D Dr. Matthias St. Pierre

DRBG: make locking api truly private

In PR #5295 it was decided that the locking api should remain private
and used only inside libcrypto. However, the locking functions were added
back to `libcrypto.num` by `mkdef.pl`, because the function prototypes
were still listed in `internal/rand.h`. (This header contains functions
which are internal, but shared between libcrypto and libssl.)

This commit moves the prototypes to `rand_lcl.h` and changes the names
to lowercase, following the convention therein. It also corrects an
outdated documenting comment.
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5375)
上级 4d921bfb
......@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ RAND_F_DRBG_GET_ENTROPY:105:drbg_get_entropy
RAND_F_DRBG_SETUP:117:drbg_setup
RAND_F_GET_ENTROPY:106:get_entropy
RAND_F_RAND_BYTES:100:RAND_bytes
RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_ENABLE_LOCKING:119:RAND_DRBG_enable_locking
RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_ENABLE_LOCKING:119:rand_drbg_enable_locking
RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_GENERATE:107:RAND_DRBG_generate
RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_INSTANTIATE:108:RAND_DRBG_instantiate
RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_NEW:109:RAND_DRBG_new
......
......@@ -94,17 +94,17 @@ static RAND_DRBG *drbg_private;
* LOCKING
*
* The three shared DRBGs are intended to be used concurrently, so they
* support locking by default. It is the callers responsibility to wrap
* calls to functions like RAND_DRBG_generate() which modify the DRBGs
* internal state with calls to RAND_DRBG_lock() and RAND_DRBG_unlock().
* The functions RAND_bytes() and RAND_priv_bytes() take the locks
* automatically, so using the RAND api is thread safe as before.
*
* All other DRBG instances don't have locking enabled by default, because
* they are intendended to be used by a single thread. If it is desired,
* locking can be enabled using RAND_DRBG_enable_locking(). However, instead
* of accessing a single DRBG instance concurrently from different threads,
* it is recommended to instantiate a separate DRBG instance per thread.
* support locking. The RAND methods take the locks automatically, so using
* the RAND api (in particular RAND_bytes() and RAND_priv_bytes()) is
* thread-safe. Note however that accessing the shared DRBGs directly via
* the RAND_DRBG interface is *not* thread-safe.
*
* All other DRBG instances don't support locking, because they are
* intendended to be used by a single thread. Instead of accessing a single
* DRBG instance concurrently from different threads, it is recommended to
* instantiate a separate DRBG instance per thread. Using the same shared
* DRBG (preferrably the public DRBG) as parent of DRBG instances on
* different threads is safe.
*/
......@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ int RAND_DRBG_set_reseed_time_interval(RAND_DRBG *drbg, time_t interval)
*
* Returns 1 on success, 0 on failure.
*/
int RAND_DRBG_lock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
int rand_drbg_lock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
{
if (drbg->lock != NULL)
return CRYPTO_THREAD_write_lock(drbg->lock);
......@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ int RAND_DRBG_lock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
*
* Returns 1 on success, 0 on failure.
*/
int RAND_DRBG_unlock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
int rand_drbg_unlock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
{
if (drbg->lock != NULL)
return CRYPTO_THREAD_unlock(drbg->lock);
......@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ int RAND_DRBG_unlock(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
*
* Returns 1 on success, 0 on failure.
*/
int RAND_DRBG_enable_locking(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
int rand_drbg_enable_locking(RAND_DRBG *drbg)
{
if (drbg->state != DRBG_UNINITIALISED) {
RANDerr(RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_ENABLE_LOCKING,
......@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static RAND_DRBG *drbg_setup(RAND_DRBG *parent)
if (drbg == NULL)
return NULL;
if (RAND_DRBG_enable_locking(drbg) == 0)
if (rand_drbg_enable_locking(drbg) == 0)
goto err;
if (parent == NULL) {
......@@ -869,9 +869,9 @@ static int drbg_bytes(unsigned char *out, int count)
if (drbg == NULL)
return 0;
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg);
ret = RAND_DRBG_bytes(drbg, out, count);
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg);
return ret;
}
......@@ -898,11 +898,11 @@ static int drbg_add(const void *buf, int num, double randomness)
return 0;
}
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg);
ret = rand_drbg_restart(drbg, buf,
(size_t)(unsigned int)num,
(size_t)(8*randomness));
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg);
return ret;
}
......@@ -922,9 +922,9 @@ static int drbg_status(void)
if (drbg == NULL)
return 0;
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg);
ret = drbg->state == DRBG_READY ? 1 : 0;
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static const ERR_STRING_DATA RAND_str_functs[] = {
{ERR_PACK(ERR_LIB_RAND, RAND_F_GET_ENTROPY, 0), "get_entropy"},
{ERR_PACK(ERR_LIB_RAND, RAND_F_RAND_BYTES, 0), "RAND_bytes"},
{ERR_PACK(ERR_LIB_RAND, RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_ENABLE_LOCKING, 0),
"RAND_DRBG_enable_locking"},
"rand_drbg_enable_locking"},
{ERR_PACK(ERR_LIB_RAND, RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_GENERATE, 0),
"RAND_DRBG_generate"},
{ERR_PACK(ERR_LIB_RAND, RAND_F_RAND_DRBG_INSTANTIATE, 0),
......
......@@ -222,6 +222,12 @@ size_t rand_drbg_get_additional_data(unsigned char **pout, size_t max_len);
int rand_drbg_restart(RAND_DRBG *drbg,
const unsigned char *buffer, size_t len, size_t entropy);
/* locking api */
int rand_drbg_lock(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
int rand_drbg_unlock(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
int rand_drbg_enable_locking(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
/* initializes the AES-CTR DRBG implementation */
int drbg_ctr_init(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
......
......@@ -203,13 +203,13 @@ size_t rand_drbg_get_entropy(RAND_DRBG *drbg,
* generating bits from it. (Note: taking the lock will be a no-op
* if locking if drbg->parent->lock == NULL.)
*/
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg->parent);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg->parent);
if (RAND_DRBG_generate(drbg->parent,
buffer, bytes_needed,
0,
(unsigned char *)drbg, sizeof(*drbg)) != 0)
bytes = bytes_needed;
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg->parent);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg->parent);
entropy_available = RAND_POOL_add_end(pool, bytes, 8 * bytes);
}
......@@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ int RAND_poll(void)
if (drbg == NULL)
return 0;
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg);
ret = rand_drbg_restart(drbg, NULL, 0, 0);
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg);
return ret;
......@@ -797,9 +797,9 @@ int RAND_priv_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num)
return 0;
/* We have to lock the DRBG before generating bits from it. */
RAND_DRBG_lock(drbg);
rand_drbg_lock(drbg);
ret = RAND_DRBG_bytes(drbg, buf, num);
RAND_DRBG_unlock(drbg);
rand_drbg_unlock(drbg);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -48,10 +48,6 @@ int RAND_DRBG_bytes(RAND_DRBG *drbg, unsigned char *out, size_t outlen);
int RAND_DRBG_set_reseed_interval(RAND_DRBG *drbg, unsigned int interval);
int RAND_DRBG_set_reseed_time_interval(RAND_DRBG *drbg, time_t interval);
int RAND_DRBG_lock(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
int RAND_DRBG_unlock(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
int RAND_DRBG_enable_locking(RAND_DRBG *drbg);
RAND_DRBG *RAND_DRBG_get0_master(void);
RAND_DRBG *RAND_DRBG_get0_public(void);
RAND_DRBG *RAND_DRBG_get0_private(void);
......
......@@ -4501,8 +4501,5 @@ EVP_sha512_256 4442 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
EVP_sha512_224 4443 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
OCSP_basic_sign_ctx 4444 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:OCSP
RAND_DRBG_bytes 4445 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
RAND_DRBG_lock 4446 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
RAND_DRBG_unlock 4447 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
RAND_DRBG_enable_locking 4448 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
RAND_DRBG_secure_new 4449 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
OSSL_STORE_vctrl 4450 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
RAND_DRBG_secure_new 4446 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
OSSL_STORE_vctrl 4447 1_1_1 EXIST::FUNCTION:
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册