Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
OpenHarmony
Third Party Openssl
提交
b2ed4629
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
OpenHarmony
/
Third Party Openssl
9 个月 前同步成功
通知
8
Star
18
Fork
1
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
前往新版Gitcode,体验更适合开发者的 AI 搜索 >>
提交
b2ed4629
编写于
8月 17, 2001
作者:
L
Lutz Jänicke
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Unidirectional shutdown is allowed according to the RFC.
上级
bb766a0a
变更
1
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
1 changed file
with
18 addition
and
6 deletion
+18
-6
doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
+18
-6
未找到文件。
doc/ssl/SSL_shutdown.pod
浏览文件 @
b2ed4629
...
...
@@ -23,16 +23,27 @@ a currently open session is considered closed and good and will be kept in the
session cache for further reuse.
The shutdown procedure consists of 2 steps: the sending of the "close notify"
shutdown alert and the receipt ion of the peer's "close notify" shutdown
alert:
shutdown alert and the reception of the peer's "close notify" shutdown
alert. According to the TLS standard, it is acceptable for an application
to only send its shutdown alert and then close the underlying connection
without waiting for the peer's response (this way resources can be saved,
as the process can already terminate or serve another connection).
When the underlying connection shall be used for more communications, the
complete shutdown procedure (bidirectional "close notify" alerts) must be
performed, so that the peers stay synchronized.
SSL_shutdown() supports both uni- and bidirectional shutdown by its 2 step
behaviour.
=over 4
=item When the application is the first party to send the "close notify"
alert, SSL_shutdown() will only send the alert and the set the
SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN flag (so that the session is considered good and will
be kept in cache). SSL_shutdown() will then return with 0. In order to
complete the shutdown handshake, SSL_shutdown() must be called again.
be kept in cache). SSL_shutdown() will then return with 0. If a unidirectional
shutdown is enough (the underlying connection shall be closed anyway), this
first call to SSL_shutdown() is sufficient. In order to complete the
bidirectional shutdown handshake, SSL_shutdown() must be called again.
The second call will make SSL_shutdown() wait for the peer's "close notify"
shutdown alert. On success, the second call to SSL_shutdown() will return
with 1.
...
...
@@ -40,7 +51,7 @@ with 1.
=item If the peer already sent the "close notify" alert B<and> it was
already processed implicitly inside another call of e.g.
B<SSL_read(3)|SSL_read(3)>, SSL_shutdown() will send the "close notify"
alert and will immediately return with 1.
alert
, set the SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN flag
and will immediately return with 1.
=back
...
...
@@ -79,7 +90,8 @@ and the peer's "close notify" alert was received.
=item 0
The shutdown is not yet finished. Call SSL_shutdown() for a second time.
The shutdown is not yet finished. Call SSL_shutdown() for a second time,
if a bidirectional shutdown shall be performed.
The output of L<SSL_get_error(3)|SSL_get_error(3)> may be misleading, as an
erroneous SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL may be flagged even though no error occurred.
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录