提交 e9883d28 编写于 作者: R Richard Levitte

Finally, a bn_div_words() in VAX assembler that goes through all tests.

PR: 413
上级 8d6ad9e3
......@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ n=12 ;(AP) n by value (input)
; }
;
; Using EDIV would be very easy, if it didn't do signed calculations.
; Any time, any of the input numbers are signed, there are problems,
; Any time any of the input numbers are signed, there are problems,
; usually with integer overflow, at which point it returns useless
; data (the quotient gets the value of l, and the remainder becomes 0).
;
......@@ -180,21 +180,26 @@ n=12 ;(AP) n by value (input)
; it by 2 (unsigned), do the division, multiply the resulting quotient
; and remainder by 2, add the bit that was dropped when dividing by 2
; to the remainder, and do some adjustment so the remainder doesn't
; end up larger than the divisor. This method works as long as the
; divisor is positive, so we'll keep that (with a small adjustment)
; as the main method.
; For some cases when the divisor is negative (from EDIV's point of
; view, i.e. when the highest bit is set), dividing the dividend by
; 2 isn't enough, it needs to be divided by 4. Furthermore, the
; divisor needs to be divided by 2 (unsigned) as well, to avoid more
; problems with the sign. In this case, a little extra fiddling with
; the remainder is required.
; end up larger than the divisor. For some cases when the divisor is
; negative (from EDIV's point of view, i.e. when the highest bit is set),
; dividing the dividend by 2 isn't enough, and since some operations
; might generate integer overflows even when the dividend is divided by
; 4 (when the high part of the shifted down dividend ends up being exactly
; half of the divisor, the result is the quotient 0x80000000, which is
; negative...) it needs to be divided by 8. Furthermore, the divisor needs
; to be divided by 2 (unsigned) as well, to avoid more problems with the sign.
; In this case, a little extra fiddling with the remainder is required.
;
; So, the simplest way to handle this is always to divide the dividend
; by 4, and to divide the divisor by 2 if it's highest bit is set.
; After EDIV has been used, the quotient gets multiplied by 4 if the
; original divisor was positive, otherwise 2. The remainder, oddly
; enough, is *always* multiplied by 4.
; by 8, and to divide the divisor by 2 if it's highest bit is set.
; After EDIV has been used, the quotient gets multiplied by 8 if the
; original divisor was positive, otherwise 4. The remainder, oddly
; enough, is *always* multiplied by 8.
; NOTE: in the case mentioned above, where the high part of the shifted
; down dividend ends up being exactly half the shifted down divisor, we
; end up with a 33 bit quotient. That's no problem however, it usually
; means we have ended up with a too large remainder as well, and the
; problem is fixed by the last part of the algorithm (next paragraph).
;
; The routine ends with comparing the resulting remainder with the
; original divisor and if the remainder is larger, subtract the
......@@ -204,15 +209,19 @@ n=12 ;(AP) n by value (input)
; The complete algorithm looks like this:
;
; d' = d
; l' = l & 3
; [h,l] = [h,l] >> 2
; l' = l & 7
; [h,l] = [h,l] >> 3
; [q,r] = floor([h,l] / d) # This is the EDIV operation
; if (q < 0) q = -q # I doubt this is necessary any more
;
; r' = r >> 30
; if (d' >= 0) q = q << 1
; q = q << 1
; r = (r << 2) + l'
; r' = r >> 29
; if (d' >= 0)
; q' = q >> 29
; q = q << 3
; else
; q' = q >> 30
; q = q << 2
; r = (r << 3) + l'
;
; if (d' < 0)
; {
......@@ -220,14 +229,14 @@ n=12 ;(AP) n by value (input)
; while ([r',r] < 0)
; {
; [r',r] = [r',r] + d
; q = q - 1
; [q',q] = [q',q] - 1
; }
; }
;
; while ([r',r] >= d)
; while ([r',r] >= d')
; {
; [r',r] = [r',r] - d
; q = q + 1
; [r',r] = [r',r] - d'
; [q',q] = [q',q] + 1
; }
;
; return q
......@@ -236,31 +245,37 @@ h=4 ;(AP) h by value (input)
l=8 ;(AP) l by value (input)
d=12 ;(AP) d by value (input)
;lprim=r5
;rprim=r6
;dprim=r7
;r2 = l, q
;r3 = h, r
;r4 = d
;r5 = l'
;r6 = r'
;r7 = d'
;r8 = q'
.psect code,nowrt
.entry bn_div_words,^m<r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7>
.entry bn_div_words,^m<r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7,r8>
movl l(ap),r2
movl h(ap),r3
movl d(ap),r4
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFFC,r2,r5 ; l' = l & 3
bicl3 #^X00000003,r2,r2
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFF8,r2,r5 ; l' = l & 7
bicl3 #^X00000007,r2,r2
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFFC,r3,r6
bicl3 #^X00000003,r3,r3
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFF8,r3,r6
bicl3 #^X00000007,r3,r3
addl r6,r2
rotl #-2,r2,r2 ; l = l >> 2
rotl #-2,r3,r3 ; h = h >> 2
rotl #-3,r2,r2 ; l = l >> 3
rotl #-3,r3,r3 ; h = h >> 3
movl #0,r6
movl r4,r7 ; d' = d
movl #0,r6 ; r' = 0
movl #0,r8 ; q' = 0
tstl r4
beql 666$ ; Uh-oh, the divisor is 0...
bgtr 1$
......@@ -277,44 +292,55 @@ d=12 ;(AP) d by value (input)
3$:
tstl r7
blss 4$
ashl #1,r2,r2 ; if d' >= 0, q = q << 1
4$:
ashl #1,r2,r2 ; q = q << 1
rotl #2,r3,r3 ; r = r << 2
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFFC,r3,r6 ; r' gets the high bits from r
bicl3 #^X00000003,r3,r3
rotl #3,r2,r2 ; q = q << 3
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFF8,r2,r8 ; q' gets the high bits from q
bicl3 #^X00000007,r2,r2
bsb 41$
4$: ; else
rotl #2,r2,r2 ; q = q << 2
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFFC,r2,r8 ; q' gets the high bits from q
bicl3 #^X00000003,r2,r2
41$:
rotl #3,r3,r3 ; r = r << 3
bicl3 #^XFFFFFFF8,r3,r6 ; r' gets the high bits from r
bicl3 #^X00000007,r3,r3
addl r5,r3 ; r = r + l'
tstl r7
bgeq 5$
bitl #1,r7
beql 5$ ; if d' < 0 && d' & 1
subl r2,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] - q
sbwc #0,r6
subl r2,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] - [q',q]
sbwc r8,r6
45$:
bgeq 5$ ; while r < 0
decl r2 ; q = q - 1
addl r7,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] + d
decl r2 ; [q',q] = [q',q] - 1
sbwc #0,r8
addl r7,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] + d'
adwc #0,r6
brb 45$
; The return points are placed in the middle to keep a short distance from
; all the branch points
42$:
; movl r3,r1
movl r2,r0
ret
666$:
movl #^XFFFFFFFF,r0
ret
5$:
tstl r6
bneq 6$
cmpl r3,r7
blssu 42$ ; while [r',r] >= d'
6$:
subl r7,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] - d
subl r7,r3 ; [r',r] = [r',r] - d'
sbwc #0,r6
incl r2 ; q = q + 1
incl r2 ; [q',q] = [q',q] + 1
adwc #0,r8
brb 5$
42$:
; movl r3,r1
movl r2,r0
ret
666$:
movl #^XFFFFFFFF,r0
ret
.title vax_bn_add_words unsigned add of two arrays
;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册