提交 f9595988 编写于 作者: D Dr. Stephen Henson

update references to new RI RFC

上级 5a9e3f05
......@@ -929,14 +929,14 @@
[Steve Henson]
*) If client attempts to renegotiate and doesn't support RI respond with
a no_renegotiation alert as required by draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation.
Some renegotiating TLS clients will continue a connection gracefully
when they receive the alert. Unfortunately OpenSSL mishandled
this alert and would hang waiting for a server hello which it will never
receive. Now we treat a received no_renegotiation alert as a fatal
error. This is because applications requesting a renegotiation might well
expect it to succeed and would have no code in place to handle the server
denying it so the only safe thing to do is to terminate the connection.
a no_renegotiation alert as required by RFC5746. Some renegotiating
TLS clients will continue a connection gracefully when they receive
the alert. Unfortunately OpenSSL mishandled this alert and would hang
waiting for a server hello which it will never receive. Now we treat a
received no_renegotiation alert as a fatal error. This is because
applications requesting a renegotiation might well expect it to succeed
and would have no code in place to handle the server denying it so the
only safe thing to do is to terminate the connection.
[Steve Henson]
*) Add ctrl macro SSL_get_secure_renegotiation_support() which returns 1 if
......@@ -948,10 +948,9 @@
the updated NID creation version. This should correctly handle UTF8.
[Steve Henson]
*) Implement draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-03. Re-enable
renegotiation but require the extension as needed. Unfortunately,
SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION turns out to be a
bad idea. It has been replaced by
*) Implement RFC5746. Re-enable renegotiation but require the extension
as needed. Unfortunately, SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION
turns out to be a bad idea. It has been replaced by
SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION which can be set with
SSL_CTX_set_options(). This is really not recommended unless you
know what you are doing.
......
......@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Major changes between OpenSSL 0.9.8l and OpenSSL 1.0:
o Support for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-03.txt
o Support for RFC5746 TLS renegotiation extension.
o RFC3280 path validation: sufficient to process PKITS tests.
o Integrated support for PVK files and keyblobs.
o Change default private key format to PKCS#8.
......
......@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ these options.
=head1 SECURE RENEGOTIATION
OpenSSL 0.9.8m and later always attempts to use secure renegotiation as
described in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (FIXME: replace by RFC). This
counters the prefix attack described in CVE-2009-3555 and elsewhere.
described in RFC5746. This counters the prefix attack described in
CVE-2009-3555 and elsewhere.
The deprecated and highly broken SSLv2 protocol does not support secure
renegotiation at all: its use is B<strongly> discouraged.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册