If we don't have any clue about a master since it never replied to INFO
so far, reply with an -IDONTKNOW error to SENTINEL
get-master-addr-by-name requests.

Before this commit Sentienl used to redirect master ip/addr if the
current instance reported to be a slave only if this was the first INFO
output received, and the role was found to be slave.

Now instead also if we find that the runid is different, and the
reported role is slave, we also redirect to the reported master ip/addr.

This unifies the behavior of Sentinel in the case of a reboot (where it
will see the first INFO output with the wrong role and will perform the
redirection), with the behavior of Sentinel in the case of a change in
what it sees in the INFO output of the master.

Older versions of Redis (before 2.4.17) don't publish the runid field in
INFO. This commit makes Sentinel able to handle that without crashing.

The new "redis_mode" field in the INFO output will show if Redis is
running in standalone mode, cluster, or sentinel mode.

The slave priority that is now published by Redis in INFO output is
now used by Sentinel in order to select the slave with minimum priority
for promotion, and in order to consider slaves with priority set to 0 as
not able to play the role of master (they will never be promoted by
Sentinel).

The "slave-priority" field is now one of the fileds that Sentinel
publishes when describing an instance via the SENTINEL commands such as
"SENTINEL slaves mastername".

Note that the assertion guarantees that one of the if branches setting
table is always entered.

From the point of view of Redis an instance replying -BUSY is down,
since it is effectively not able to reply to user requests. However
a looping script is a recoverable condition in Redis if the script still
did not performed any write to the dataset. In that case performing a
fail over is not optimal, so Sentinel now tries to restore the normal server
condition killing the script with a SCRIPT KILL command.

If the script already performed some write before entering an infinite
(or long enough to timeout) loop, SCRIPT KILL will not work and the
fail over will be triggered anyway.

The call to sentinelScheduleScriptExecution() lacked the final NULL
argument to signal the end of arguments. This resulted into a crash.

This command can be used in order to force a Sentinel instance to start
a failover for the specified master, as leader, forcing the failover
even if the master is up.

The commit also adds some minor refactoring and other improvements to
functions already implemented that make them able to work when the
master is not in SDOWN condition. For instance slave selection
assumed that we ask INFO every second to every slave, this is true
only when the master is in SDOWN condition, so slave selection did not
worked when the master was not in SDOWN condition.

This commit adds support to optionally execute a script when one of the
following events happen:

* The failover starts (with a slave already promoted).
* The failover ends.
* The failover is aborted.

The script is called with enough parameters (documented in the example
sentinel.conf file) to provide information about the old and new ip:port
pair of the master, the role of the sentinel (leader or observer) and
the name of the master.

The goal of the script is to inform clients of the configuration change
in a way specific to the environment Sentinel is running, that can't be
implemented in a genereal way inside Sentinel itself.

When we are in wait start, if another leader (or any other external
entity) turns a slave into a master, abort the failover, and detect it
as an observer.

Note that the wait-start state is mainly there for this reason but the
abort was yet not implemented.

This adds a new sentinel event -failover-abort-race.

When we are a Leader Sentinel in wait-start state, starting with this
commit the failover is aborted if the master returns online.

This improves the way we handle a notable case of net split, that is the
split between Sentinels and Redis servers, that will be a very common
case of split becase Sentinels will often be installed in the client's
network and servers can be in a differnt arm of the network.

When Sentinels and Redis servers are isolated the master is in ODOWN
condition since the Sentinels can agree about this state, however the
failover does not start since there are no good slaves to promote (in
this specific case all the slaves are unreachable).

However when the split is resolved, Sentinels may sense the slave back
a moment before they sense the master is back, so the failover may start
without a good reason (since the master is actually working too).

Now this condition is reversible, so the failover will be aborted
immediately after if the master is detected to be working again, that
is, not in SDOWN nor in ODOWN condition.

We no longer use a vanilla fork+execve but take a queue of jobs of
scripts to execute, with retry on error, timeouts, and so forth.

Currently this is used only for notifications but soon the ability to
also call clients reconfiguration scripts will be added.

gcc warned about an implicit declaration of function 'wait3'.
Including this header fixes this.

improve English a bit. :-)

The previous behavior of the state machine was to wait some time and
retry the slave selection, but this is not robust enough against drastic
changes in the conditions of the monitored instances.

What we do now when the slave selection fails is to abort the failover
and return back monitoring the master. If the ODOWN condition is still
present a new failover will be triggered and so forth.

This commit also refactors the code we use to abort a failover.

When we reset the master we should start with clean timestamps for ping
replies otherwise we'll detect a spurious +sdown event, because on
+master-switch event the previous master instance was probably in +sdown
condition. Since we updated the address we should count time from
scratch again.

Also this commit makes sure to explicitly reset the count of pending
commands, now we can do this because of the new way the hiredis link
is closed.

We disconnect the Redis instances hiredis link in a more robust way now.
Also we change the way we perform the redirection for the +switch-master
event, that is not just an instance reset with an address change.

Using the same system we now implement the +redirect-to-master event
that is triggered by an instance that is configured to be master but
found to be a slave at the first INFO reply. In that case we monitor the
master instead, logging the incident as an event.

We can't be sure the instance object still exists when the reply
callback is called.

Sentinel observers detect failover checking if a slave attached to the
monitored master turns into its replication state from slave to master.
However while this change may in theory only happen after a SLAVEOF NO
ONE command, in practie it is very easy to reboot a slave instance with
a wrong configuration that turns it into a master, especially if it was
a past master before a successfull failover.

This commit changes the detection policy so that if an instance goes
from slave to master, but at the same time the runid has changed, we
sense a reboot, and in that case we don't detect a failover at all.

This commit also introduces the "reboot" sentinel event, that is logged
at "warning" level (so this will trigger an admin notification).

The commit also fixes a problem in the disconnect handler that assumed
that the instance object always existed, that is not the case. Now we
no longer assume that redisAsyncFree() will call the disconnection
handler before returning.

This commit implements the first, beta quality implementation of Redis
Sentinel, a distributed monitoring system for Redis with notification
and automatic failover capabilities.

More info at http://redis.io/topics/sentinel

For "CASE 4" (see code) we need to free the element if it's already in
the result dictionary and adding it failed.

SRANDMEMBER called with just the key argument can just return a single
random element from a Redis Set. However many users need to return
multiple unique elements from a Set, this is not a trivial problem to
handle in the client side, and for truly good performance a C
implementation was required.

After many requests for this feature it was finally implemented.

The problem implementing this command is the strategy to follow when
the number of elements the user asks for is near to the number of
elements that are already inside the set. In this case asking random
elements to the dictionary API, and trying to add it to a temporary set,
may result into an extremely poor performance, as most add operations
will be wasted on duplicated elements.

For this reason this implementation uses a different strategy in this
case: the Set is copied, and random elements are returned to reach the
specified count.

The code actually uses 4 different algorithms optimized for the
different cases.

If the count is negative, the command changes behavior and allows for
duplicated elements in the returned subset.

Redis provides support for blocking operations such as BLPOP or BRPOP.
This operations are identical to normal LPOP and RPOP operations as long
as there are elements in the target list, but if the list is empty they
block waiting for new data to arrive to the list.

All the clients blocked waiting for th same list are served in a FIFO
way, so the first that blocked is the first to be served when there is
more data pushed by another client into the list.

The previous implementation of blocking operations was conceived to
serve clients in the context of push operations. For for instance:

1) There is a client "A" blocked on list "foo".
2) The client "B" performs `LPUSH foo somevalue`.
3) The client "A" is served in the context of the "B" LPUSH,
synchronously.

Processing things in a synchronous way was useful as if "A" pushes a
value that is served by "B", from the point of view of the database is a
NOP (no operation) thing, that is, nothing is replicated, nothing is
written in the AOF file, and so forth.

However later we implemented two things:

1) Variadic LPUSH that could add multiple values to a list in the
context of a single call.
2) BRPOPLPUSH that was a version of BRPOP that also provided a "PUSH"
side effect when receiving data.

This forced us to make the synchronous implementation more complex. If
client "B" is waiting for data, and "A" pushes three elemnents in a
single call, we needed to propagate an LPUSH with a missing argument
in the AOF and replication link. We also needed to make sure to
replicate the LPUSH side of BRPOPLPUSH, but only if in turn did not
happened to serve another blocking client into another list ;)

This were complex but with a few of mutually recursive functions
everything worked as expected... until one day we introduced scripting
in Redis.

Scripting + synchronous blocking operations = Issue #614.

Basically you can't "rewrite" a script to have just a partial effect on
the replicas and AOF file if the script happened to serve a few blocked
clients.

The solution to all this problems, implemented by this commit, is to
change the way we serve blocked clients. Instead of serving the blocked
clients synchronously, in the context of the command performing the PUSH
operation, it is now an asynchronous and iterative process:

1) If a key that has clients blocked waiting for data is the subject of
a list push operation, We simply mark keys as "ready" and put it into a
queue.
2) Every command pushing stuff on lists, as a variadic LPUSH, a script,
or whatever it is, is replicated verbatim without any rewriting.
3) Every time a Redis command, a MULTI/EXEC block, or a script,
completed its execution, we run the list of keys ready to serve blocked
clients (as more data arrived), and process this list serving the
blocked clients.
4) As a result of "3" maybe more keys are ready again for other clients
(as a result of BRPOPLPUSH we may have push operations), so we iterate
back to step "3" if it's needed.

The new code has a much simpler semantics, and a simpler to understand
implementation, with the disadvantage of not being able to "optmize out"
a PUSH+BPOP as a No OP.

This commit will be tested with care before the final merge, more tests
will be added likely.